|
Money Matters - How Much To Bet?
Bet sizing is
one of the most important elements in punting success, yet all
but a few punters even consider it's implications or understand
how much they should really be betting. They might have read
somewhere that 2% of their bank is a conservative amount, so they
stick to that level for each selection. Others might believe
that they don't need to be conservative, so they stake at 3%
of their bank or higher. In the worst cases, the punter
regularly changes their bet size depending on a whole range of
emotional and situational factors on the day.
For example,
have you ever bet more or less on a particular horse because:
1. You were
winning on the day?
2. You were
losing on the day?
3. You see or
hear that the "big money" has come for it?
4. It's very
short in betting and the consensus of opinion is that it's
virtually over the line?
It's obvious to
most that regularly changing your bet size in the above
circumstances does not promote long-term success, but even if
you follow a consistent staking level you may still not be
headed down the right path towards your punting goals.
The principal
goal of betting for financial gain is to maximise profit
dollars while protecting your bankroll within a risk
threshold you are comfortable with. Depending on the odds range
of horses you back and your overall winning edge, you will
experience drawdown (losing) periods that eat into your betting
capital. The amount that these losing periods take from your
betting capital is essentially your betting risk.
Most punters understand
that they need to maximise their profit, but they don't consider
the other side of the equation and that is the level of risk
they expose their bankroll to. To be a successful punter you
need to get the right balance between profit and risk.
How Does
Bet Size
Fit Into The Equation?
1. If you
bet too much on each selection then normally expected
losing runs (drawdown periods) will either wipe out your
bankroll entirely or see it get so low that you lose confidence
in your selection method and change it, or give up betting
(either entirely or until you get a new bank.) Many people follow this pattern for
their entire betting lives and it's often because they
simply bet too much on each horse (relative to their bankroll),
rather than the selection method itself.
2. If you
don't bet enough on each selection, then you will be under-utilising
your betting capital and not making the most amount of profit
from it possible.
For example, if
you have a $10,000 betting bank, staking an average of $1000 on
each selection no matter what your strike rate or edge, will
eventually see you go broke (risk too high). At the same time,
staking just $50 on each selection will never see you go broke
(assuming you have a profit edge), but at the same time you
won't make nearly as much money as you should with that amount
of capital (risk too low.)
Either way, you
are not achieving the principal goal of betting... "maximising
your profit dollars while
protecting your bankroll within a risk threshold you
are comfortable with."
Assuming you
have a profit edge, the key driver in achieving this goal is
getting your bet size right!
What
Determines The Optimal Bet Size?
When betting
horses to win, the optimal bet size depends on three key
factors:
1. The
probability of success i.e. strike rate %
2. Your edge
over the market i.e. profit %
3. Your
personal risk threshold i.e. the percentage of your starting
capital you are comfortable exposing during the largest losing runs
you will experience
in a medium to long-term betting
cycle. The more you are happy to risk, the larger your bet can
be and therefore the more profit you can make. Of course a
larger bet size means you can also lose more, so balance is the
key.
For the sake of
simplicity in this article we are going to assume a range of average
strike rates for all bets and an overall profit edge of 10% (i.e.
10% profit on turnover.) Most people tend to significantly
overestimate their long-term edge, so using a standard 10% will
help steer you in the right direction for practical bet sizing.
The risk
threshold you decide on is a personal thing, but might be
influenced by the amount of
capital you plan to start with and the impact on your life if
you lose it. Starting with $1,000 you may
decide to be more aggressive and set your risk to 75% or higher
as losing that amount won't greatly affect your life.
However if you are starting with significantly more then you
will probably want to be more conservative (around 50% or lower).
A risk
threshold of 50% may seem low to some... after all, if you have
$10,000 to bet with, why size your bets so that you only lose
$5,000 in a big losing run?
Well, your risk
threshold isn't only about protecting your bank so that you
don't lose it all during a losing run. Just as importantly it's
about protecting
your confidence so that at the bottom of a losing run you still
have enough money left behind you to feel confident enough to
continue.
Take it as a
given that you will experience big losing runs (even if you are
a winning punter) and that protecting your
confidence so you can continue is absolutely vital. You
cannot afford to allow your bank to get to so low that you
feel like giving up and switching to something else. Falling into this pattern
means you will never reach your punting goals. Also remember
that losing runs can always be greater than expected so it pays
to be conservative.
What Is
The Optimal Bet Size?
Through a
process of over 1,000,000 betting simulations we were able to
calculate the drawdowns experienced during losing periods at
various strike rate levels and the impact that has on your
betting bank for different bet sizes. From that data we can
present the following table, which shows a the optimal bet size
for a given strike rate and risk threshold (assuming 10% profit
edge.)
| |
|
RISK THRESHOLD |
| |
|
40% |
50% |
60% |
70% |
80% |
|
SR% |
Avg Div |
Bet |
Bet |
Bet |
Bet |
Bet |
|
20.0% |
$ 5.50 |
0.5% |
0.7% |
0.8% |
0.9% |
1.1% |
|
25.0% |
$ 4.40 |
0.6% |
0.8% |
0.9% |
1.1% |
1.2% |
|
30.0% |
$ 3.67 |
0.7% |
0.9% |
1.1% |
1.3% |
1.4% |
|
35.0% |
$ 3.14 |
0.8% |
1.0% |
1.2% |
1.4% |
1.6% |
|
40.0% |
$ 2.75 |
0.9% |
1.2% |
1.4% |
1.6% |
1.9% |
|
45.0% |
$ 2.44 |
1.1% |
1.3% |
1.6% |
1.9% |
2.2% |
|
50.0% |
$ 2.20 |
1.2% |
1.6% |
1.9% |
2.2% |
2.5% |
If your average
strike rate is 35% and you set a 60% risk threshold then the
optimal average bet is 1.2% of your bank. This bet size will
allow you to maximise your profit, while staying within the 60%
risk threshold you decided on.
In practice, if
you start with $10,000 and bet an average of 1.2% of your
starting bank ($120) then chances are that at some stage you
will drop around $6,000 from your historical bank high. Seems a
lot doesn't it? Especially when you have a 10% long-term edge. Unfortunately that's the reality of betting and
one that few punters understand.
If that losing
run comes when you bank is still around $10,000 then you will be
down to $4,000. If it comes after your bank has grown to $15,000
then you will only be down to $9,000. The amount ($6,000) though
is still relative to your starting bank because that's what your
1.2% stake is based on. If you set your bet amount to 1.2% of
the increased bank (say $180 with a $15,000 bank) then your
drawdown during a big losing run will be $9,000 (60% of
$15,000.) It's all relative.
Could you still
continue in the same consistent and disciplined manner if you
started with $10,000 and dropped to $4,000? Or built your bank
to $15,000, only to see it fall to $9,000 during an extended
losing run? It's not something you can answer until you are in
that situation, but if there is any doubt, then your risk
threshold probably needs to be lower.
This table
highlights how traditional advice causes many punters to
over-bet their selections relative to their bank. Betting 2% of
your bank with a 35% strike rate puts you well above
the 80% risk threshold (98% actually) so it's almost certain
that you will go broke or give up before that... even if you
have a 10% long-term edge. The problem has nothing to do with
your selections, but the amount you bet on them. Betting 2.5%
or even 3.0% is obviously a sure fire recipe for disaster.
As you can see,
the higher your strike rate, the more you can afford to stake
for the same level of risk. That's because a higher strike rate
provides more frequent winners and therefore less volatility in
your bankroll swings (lower risk).
In A
Nutshell...
Successful
betting is about maximising your profit dollars while protecting
your betting capital and confidence so you can continue
when faced with a
significant losing period. The only way you can do this is by
getting your bet size right. If you bet too much on each
selection then a normally expected losing run could send you
broke. If you don't bet enough then your risk will always be
below the level you could actually tolerate and you won't make as
much as you could (or should) with your betting capital.
Getting the
balance right is critical to your punting success and the
suggested bet sizes above help you to do just that. Use these
guidelines in your betting plan and you will be much better
positioned to develop and most importantly sustain a long-term
income from betting.
|