How
many times have you seen a horse finish strongly to win, only to plod home
as an unplaced favourite at its next run? What about the front-runner that
defies all challengers in the straight one start, but is then beaten on
the turn at its next? These sudden form reversals may seem like just
another element in the great uncertainty of racing, but more often than
not they can be explained by one very important factor, the influence
of early pace.
In some
races there may only be one preferred leader that is able to take up its
position with little effort. This allows the jockey to create a slow early
pace and conserve energy for the sprint home. In other races there may be
a number of front running types and jockeys have to keep their mounts
going at a good pace to maintain position. This creates a much more
genuine and sometimes fast early pace.
Different levels of early pace will suit some horses more than others.
Consider the following example of three races run over 1200m. All races
finish with the same final time of 70 seconds, but each has a different
level of early pace.
|
Race 1
|
Race 2
|
Race 3
|
First 600m
|
36 secs.
|
35 secs.
|
34 secs.
|
Last 600m
|
34 secs.
|
35 secs.
|
36 secs.
|
Total Time
|
70 secs.
|
70 secs.
|
70 secs.
|
Early pace
|
Slow
|
Even
|
Fast
|
How
does the level of early pace affect the winning chances in each race? Lets
take a look.
Race 1 – Slow early pace
In this
race the leaders have had an easy time in front and run the first 600m in
36 seconds. With plenty of energy in reserve, they sprint home in 34
seconds to finish the race in 70 seconds.
If the
leaders are sprinting home in 34 seconds, the runners behind them need to
sprint faster to make up enough ground to win. The following diagram shows
the task different horses face over the final 600m of this race.

A horse
6 lengths off the lead must sprint its final 600m in 33 seconds, while 3
lengths off the lead requires a final 600m of 33.5 seconds, just to finish
in a dead heat with the leaders. Only very good horses are capable of
breaking 33.5 seconds over the final 600m of a race and all but a very few
top class horses in Australia could break 33.0 seconds.
In
reality a horse 6 lengths back in this race stands next to no chance of
winning, while a horse 3 lengths away has a slight chance, but only if
it’s well above average in ability. Leaders and those within one length of
the lead in this race are ideally suited. Assuming they have an overall
time ability that is competitive with the field, one of them is almost
certain to win.
Race 2 – Even early pace
Here
the leaders run along at a more even speed of 35 seconds for the first
600m with enough energy to sprint home in the same time of 35 seconds.
Horses off the lead are now a little more suited as you can see in the
following diagram.

A horse
6 lengths off the lead in this race would need to run its final 600m in 34
seconds to finish equal with the leaders. This is one second slower than
what was required under slow pace conditions. It still takes a very good
performance to win in these conditions, but the task is certainly within
reach.
Race 3 – Fast early pace
In this
race the leaders run along quickly, clocking 34 seconds for the first 600m
with only enough energy to run home in 36 seconds. Horses off the lead now
face a much easier task.

A horse
6 lengths off the lead only needs to run its final 600m in 35 seconds, 2
seconds slower than they have to if the early pace is a leisurely 36
seconds. Backmarkers in these types of races are suited and capable of
winning.
We can
see that even though the final time is the same, the level of early pace
has a profound effect on the winning chance of each horse and how each
race is likely to finish.
As
these examples show, reliable estimation of early pace is one of the most
important pieces of information a punter can possess. Understanding how
well each horse is likely to be suited allows you to sort out the winning
chances from the no hopers, with more confidence than you ever thought
possible.
The
following table will help you decide how well horses with a certain
running style are suited in different pace conditions.
|
Early Pace |
In Run Position |
|
Back |
Midfield |
Handy |
Pace |
|
Slow |
ûû |
ûû |
ü |
üü |
|
B’Avg |
ûû |
û |
ü |
ü |
|
Avg |
û |
¡ |
¡ |
¡ |
|
A’Avg |
¡ |
¡ |
¡ |
¡ |
|
Fast |
ü |
ü |
¡ |
û |
|
ü
=
Favourable pace (an advantage given all other things equal) |
|
û
=
Unfavourable pace (a disadvantage given all other things equal) |
|
¡
=
Neither favourable or unfavourable pace |
As you
can see, it is generally an advantage to be on the pace or handy in
running. These types of horses are much more likely to encounter
favourable or at least neutral pace conditions. Relative frequency
statistics show that pace and handy runners win approximately 1.7 times
the number of races they should, while backmarkers only win 0.4 times as
often as they are expected to.
Of course pace suitably
needs to be considered in the context of the horses ability and current
form - so keep the following points in mind as you incorporate pace into
your future form analysis:
Good punting,